lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:57:54 +0100
From:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] driver core: handle -EPROBE_DEFER from bus_type.match()

[...]

>>> @@ -500,8 +501,17 @@ static int __device_attach_driver(struct
>>> device_driver *drv, void *_data)
>>>          if (dev->driver)
>>>                  return -EBUSY;
>>>
>>> -       if (!driver_match_device(drv, dev))
>>> +       ret = driver_match_device(drv, dev);
>>> +       if (!ret)
>>>                  return 0;
>>> +       else if (ret < 0) {
>>
>> Depending on what happens with the added dev_warn() below, perhaps a
>> switch statement can make it a bit clearer, instead of these messy if
>> clauses?
>
>
> Frankly, I have no idea how to convert this to switch statement and make

You are right!

I was thinking that "1" was the only supported positive value,
according to the documentation.

> the code easier to read. Please note that we have the following 4 cases:
>
> ret > 0: positive match
> ret == 0: negative match
> ret == -EPROBE_DEFER: deferred probe
> ret < 0: other, unknown error
>
> Another way to encode this logic is the following code:
>
> if (ret == 0) {
>         /* no match */
>         return 0;
> } else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>         dev_dbg(dev, "Device match requests probe deferral\n");
>         driver_deferred_probe_add(dev);
>         return ret;
> } else if (ret < 0) {
>         dev_dbg(dev, "Bus failed to match device: %d", ret);
>         return ret;
> } /* ret > 0 means positive match */

Okay! To me this looks better!

[...]

Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ