[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151201163939-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 16:43:05 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] vhost_net: basic polling support
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 01:17:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 11/30/2015 06:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:11:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> > This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive
> >> > queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time
> >> > spent on polling were specified through a new kind of vring ioctl.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > One further enhancement would be to actually poll
> > the underlying device. This should be reasonably
> > straight-forward with macvtap (especially in the
> > passthrough mode).
> >
> >
>
> Yes, it is. I have some patches to do this by replacing
> skb_queue_empty() with sk_busy_loop() but for tap.
We probably don't want to do this unconditionally, though.
> Tests does not show
> any improvement but some regression.
Did you add code to call sk_mark_napi_id on tap then?
sk_busy_loop won't do anything useful without.
> Maybe it's better to test macvtap.
Same thing ...
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists