[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <565DB7EC.8010201@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 16:08:28 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>, gleb@...nel.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access
On 01/12/2015 16:02, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > Applying your technique to non-leaf shadow pages actually makes this
> > series quite interesting. :) Shadow paging is still in use for nested
> > EPT, so it's always a good idea to speed it up.
>
> I don't have the full picture of how userfaultfd write tracking could
> also fit in the leaf/non-leaf shadow pagetable write tracking yet but
> it's good to think about it.
It's unrelated.
Xiao wrote this series for KVM-GT. I'm suggesting that he uses
userfaultfd write tracking (or similar techniques---but anyway
implemented out of KVM) for KVM-GT. The benefit is that KVM-GT is then
unrelated to KVM, similar to legacy KVM device assignment vs. VFIO.
However, he also applied this new API to shadow pagetable write
tracking. He gets measurable (~2%) performance improvement. We can
look separately at how to get a similar performance improvement, even if
KVM-GT will not use the new page tracking API.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists