[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8avJ9GW+YsfLuf7TLhPxvM++JUtsVo8426xoRR6Yy8cs6TJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 21:10:36 +0530
From: Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com>
To: lauro.venancio@...nbossa.org, aloisio.almeida@...nbossa.org,
sameo@...ux.intel.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFC: added the sysfs entry for nfcsim workqueue delay
pinging for feedback.
Please respond.
On 20 November 2015 at 16:07, Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com> wrote:
> I have also tested this module its successfully creating the tx_delay
> entry in nfc
>
> root@...rabh:/home/saurabh# ls /sys/class/nfc/nfc0/tx_delay
> /sys/class/nfc/nfc0/tx_delay
>
> its default value is set to 5
> root@...rabh:/home/saurabh# cat /sys/class/nfc/nfc0/tx_delay
> 5
>
> its changing the value correctly
> root@...rabh:/home/saurabh# echo 15 > /sys/class/nfc/nfc0/tx_delay
> root@...rabh:/home/saurabh# cat /sys/class/nfc/nfc0/tx_delay
> 15
>
> and on removing the module its cleaning up without any oops
>
> Tested-by: Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com>
>
> On 13 November 2015 at 16:48, Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com> wrote:
>> added the sysfs entry for nfcsim workqueue delay, as tx_delay
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com>
>> ---
>> implementing the TODO task
>>
>> drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c b/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c
>> index 26ac9e5..e77be35 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
>> #define NFCSIM_POLL_TARGET 2
>> #define NFCSIM_POLL_DUAL (NFCSIM_POLL_INITIATOR | NFCSIM_POLL_TARGET)
>>
>> +#define TX_DEFAULT_DELAY 5
>> +
>> struct nfcsim {
>> struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev;
>>
>> @@ -62,12 +64,41 @@ static struct nfcsim *dev1;
>>
>> static struct workqueue_struct *wq;
>>
>> +
>> +static int tx_delay = TX_DEFAULT_DELAY;
>> +
>> +static ssize_t show_tx_delay(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + int n;
>> +
>> + n = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", tx_delay);
>> + return n;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t store_tx_delay(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + if (kstrtouint(buf, 0, &tx_delay) < 0)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (tx_delay < 0)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + return count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR(tx_delay, 0644, show_tx_delay, store_tx_delay);
>> +
>> static void nfcsim_cleanup_dev(struct nfcsim *dev, u8 shutdown)
>> {
>> DEV_DBG(dev, "shutdown=%d\n", shutdown);
>>
>> mutex_lock(&dev->lock);
>>
>> + device_remove_file(&dev->nfc_dev->dev, &dev_attr_tx_delay);
>> dev->polling_mode = NFCSIM_POLL_NONE;
>> dev->shutting_down = shutdown;
>> dev->cb = NULL;
>> @@ -320,10 +351,8 @@ static int nfcsim_tx(struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev, struct nfc_target *target,
>> * If packet transmission occurs immediately between them, we have a
>> * non-stop flow of several tens of thousands SYMM packets per second
>> * and a burning cpu.
>> - *
>> - * TODO: Add support for a sysfs entry to control this delay.
>> */
>> - queue_delayed_work(wq, &peer->recv_work, msecs_to_jiffies(5));
>> + queue_delayed_work(wq, &peer->recv_work, msecs_to_jiffies(tx_delay));
>>
>> mutex_unlock(&peer->lock);
>>
>> @@ -461,6 +490,9 @@ static struct nfcsim *nfcsim_init_dev(void)
>> if (rc)
>> goto free_nfc_dev;
>>
>> + rc = device_create_file(&dev->nfc_dev->dev, &dev_attr_tx_delay);
>> + if (rc)
>> + pr_err("error creating sysfs entry\n");
>> return dev;
>>
>> free_nfc_dev:
>> --
>> 1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists