[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1448987913-17770-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 10:38:33 -0600
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] reset: Introduce static inline dummy function when CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER is not set
When CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER is not defined (example COMPILE_TEST),
provide a dummy static inline implementation.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
---
V2: Thanks to kbot, I realized i messed up the patch -> hopefully, this revision
has better luck.
V1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7738191/
include/linux/reset-controller.h | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/reset-controller.h b/include/linux/reset-controller.h
index ce6b962ffed4..e294565540db 100644
--- a/include/linux/reset-controller.h
+++ b/include/linux/reset-controller.h
@@ -48,7 +48,18 @@ struct reset_controller_dev {
unsigned int nr_resets;
};
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER)
int reset_controller_register(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev);
void reset_controller_unregister(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev);
+#else
+static inline int reset_controller_register(struct reset_controller_dev *r)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static inline void reset_controller_unregister(struct reset_controller_dev *r)
+{
+}
+#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER) */
#endif
--
2.6.2.402.g2635c2b
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists