[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151201213152.GW1929@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 21:31:52 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Han Xu <han.xu@...escale.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Gabor Juhos <juhosg@...nwrt.org>,
Bean Huo 霍斌斌 <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Furquan Shaikh <furquan@...gle.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] spi: expose master transfer size limitation.
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 10:07:55PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Sure .. Just one inquiry:
> When you say "the naming here" you refer to Michal's or my version?
Michael's (transfer).
> Actually I like in Michal's hook that it directly takes a struct spi_device.
> This saves the caller one level of indirection as the caller usually will
> deal with a spi_device and not a spi_master.
> If you're fine with Michal's version then this is also fine with me,
> especially as the functionality is the same.
OK.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists