[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151201222223.GA27480@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:22:23 -0700
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Wilck <Martin.Wilck@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] tpm_tis: Clean up force module parameter
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:33:51PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> I went through the patches and didn't see anything that would shock me
> enough not to apply the patches in the current if they also work when
> tested *but* are these release critical for Linux v4.4?
>
> I got a bit confused about the discussion that was going on about "where
> to fix the probe" crash whether or not both it should be fixed in both
> places.
I'm also confused by that..
It sounds like force=1 is broken in 4.4 right now - do we care? Should
we fix this by using Martin's patch?
These changes are complex enough they really shouldn't go into 4.4
unless absolutely necessary.
> Could you possibly make these apply on top of security/next and
> re-submit if needed?
It isn't trivial to reorder all 10 patches to do this, I'd like to
know we need to do this for sure first. Uwe?
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists