lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <565E4744.9020308@huawei.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Dec 2015 09:20:04 +0800
From:	Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
CC:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cpuset: return -EINVAL for legacy non-subset child creation
 attempt

On 2015/12/1 23:22, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> A legacy hierarchy child set that is not a subset of its parent is not
> a permissions issue, it's an invalid configuration.  Return -EINVAL.
>

It's sometimes arguable which errno should be used. In this case I don't
see why we can't use EACCES. It's even documented in man page.

        EACCES Attempted to add, using write(2), a CPU  or  memory  node  to  a
               cpuset, when that CPU or memory node was not already in its par-
               ent.

Let's see another example. In mmap manual:

	EACCES A  file descriptor refers to a non-regular file.

We can argue fd of a non-regular file is an invalid configuration, but
here we return EACCES.

> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> ---
>   kernel/cpuset.c |    3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static int validate_change(struct cpuset
>   	par = parent_cs(cur);
>
>   	/* On legacy hiearchy, we must be a subset of our parent cpuset. */
> -	ret = -EACCES;
> +	ret = -EINVAL;
>   	if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(cpuset_cgrp_subsys) &&
>   	    !is_cpuset_subset(trial, par))
>   		goto out;
> @@ -481,7 +481,6 @@ static int validate_change(struct cpuset
>   	 * If either I or some sibling (!= me) is exclusive, we can't
>   	 * overlap
>   	 */
> -	ret = -EINVAL;
>   	cpuset_for_each_child(c, css, par) {
>   		if ((is_cpu_exclusive(trial) || is_cpu_exclusive(c)) &&
>   		    c != cur &&
>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ