[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1449055626-14439-1-git-send-email-raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:57:06 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: <tom.leiming@...il.com>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
<jmoyer@...hat.com>, <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
<nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: Reuse hardware context cpumask for tags
hctx->cpumask is already populated and let the tag cpumask follow that
instead of going through a new for loop.
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
Nish had suggested to put cpumask_copy after WARN_ON (instead of before).
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 6d6f8fe..6ada3b4 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1854,6 +1854,7 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q,
hctx->tags = set->tags[i];
WARN_ON(!hctx->tags);
+ cpumask_copy(hctx->tags->cpumask, hctx->cpumask);
/*
* Set the map size to the number of mapped software queues.
* This is more accurate and more efficient than looping
@@ -1867,14 +1868,6 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q,
hctx->next_cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
hctx->next_cpu_batch = BLK_MQ_CPU_WORK_BATCH;
}
-
- queue_for_each_ctx(q, ctx, i) {
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(i, online_mask))
- continue;
-
- hctx = q->mq_ops->map_queue(q, i);
- cpumask_set_cpu(i, hctx->tags->cpumask);
- }
}
static void queue_set_hctx_shared(struct request_queue *q, bool shared)
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists