[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151202120056.GO18797@mwanda>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:00:56 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Amir Shehata <amir.shehata@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/40] staging: lustre: Dynamic LNet Configuration (DLC)
show command
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 06:35:49PM -0500, James Simmons wrote:
> +int lnet_get_peers(int count, __u64 *nid, char *aliveness,
> + int *ncpt, int *refcount,
> + int *ni_peer_tx_credits, int *peer_tx_credits,
> + int *peer_rtr_credits, int *peer_min_rtr_credits,
> + int *peer_tx_qnob)
> +{
> + struct lnet_peer_table *peer_table;
> + lnet_peer_t *lp;
> + int j;
> + int lncpt, found = 0;
> +
> + /* get the number of CPTs */
> + lncpt = cfs_percpt_number(the_lnet.ln_peer_tables);
> +
> + /*
> + * if the cpt number to be examined is >= the number of cpts in
> + * the system then indicate that there are no more cpts to examin
> + */
> + if (*ncpt > lncpt)
> + return -1;
The comment is correct but the code is off by one.
if (*ncpt >= lncpt)
return -EINVAL;
Also not a correct error code. I assume that you will review the whole
patchset again and fix all the -1 returns, of course.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists