[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHtKf-aEa4YvhgvZgAFLuOVbX=bdmC+YQwaAH5p2-qCAS_W8Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:20:59 +0300
From: Alexander Zarochentsev <alexander.zarochentsev@...gate.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Amir Shehata <amir.shehata@...el.com>,
lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 21/40] staging: lustre: improve LNet clean
up code and API
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> Actually we're going to have to redo so much code that it's not worth it
> for me to review the rest of these patches. Please just look over
> everything again:
>
> BAD: return -1;
> GOOD: return -EINVAL;
>
> BAD: failed0:
> GOOD: free_something:
>
> BAD: if (rc != 0)
> GOOD: if (rc)
The latest suggestion is not correct,
from http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_Coding_Guidelines :
Conditional boolean (if (expr)), scalar (if (val != 0)) and pointer
(if (ptr != NULL)) expressions should be written consistently.
Thanks,
--
Alexander Zarochentsev
Seagate Technology, LLC
www.seagate.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists