[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <565F0681.8070905@cardoe.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 08:56:01 -0600
From: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@...doe.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>,
Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Jonathan Creekmore <jonathan.creekmore@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-pciback: fix up cleanup path when alloc fails
On 12/2/15 4:35 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 26/11/15 20:32, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> When allocating a pciback device fails, avoid the possibility of a
>> use after free.
>
> We should not require clearing drvdata for correctness. We should
> ensure we retain drvdata for as long as it is needed.
>
> I note that pcistub_device_release() has:
>
> kfree(dev_data);
> pci_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
>
> /* Clean-up the device */
> xen_pcibk_config_free_dyn_fields(dev);
> xen_pcibk_config_free_dev(dev);
>
> Which should (at a minimum) be reordered to move the kfree(dev_data) to
> after the calls that require it
>
> David
>
I apologize but at this point I'm confused at what action I should be
taking. Are you saying NACK to the original patch and suggesting this as
the replacement? Or saying that this should be done in addition to the
original patch?
I created the original patch when looking through the other probe()
calls and seeing that they all did pci_set_drvdata() with memory they
allocated but probe() failed they ensured that pci_set_drvdata() was
cleared. But the behavior in xen-pciback was different. It kfree()'d the
memory that passed to pci_set_drvdata() and never set that pointer to
NULL. Which could possibly result in a use after free. The use after
free doesn't occur today as Konrad pointed out but in the future its
possible should some other code changes occur. It was more of a
defensive coding patch in the end. I had planned on resubmitting the
patch with a reworded commit message after Konrad pointed out there was
currently no use after free and retaining the Reviewed-By since the code
wouldn't change but if that's not what I should be doing I will gladly
go another route.
--
Doug Goldstein
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (960 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists