linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: host: pci_quirks: fix memory leak, by adding iounmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA8avJ-5nj=pJ8b4Ywd4Kdmra+Ap+S1fQL3+84pE-Sv3sX+mDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Dec 2015 21:25:53 +0530
From:	Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	mathias.nyman@...el.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: host: pci_quirks: fix memory leak, by adding iounmap

Hi Greg,

I am little unclear.
Now, shall I resend my patch on top of usb.git tree or linux.git tree.

Regards,
Saurabh

On 2 December 2015 at 21:15, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:08:06AM +0530, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
>> On 2 December 2015 at 04:05, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:46:30PM +0530, Saurabh Sengar wrote:
>> >> added iounmap inorder to free memory mapped to base before returning
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c | 4 ++--
>> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c b/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
>> >> index f940056..332f687 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
>> >> @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ static void quirk_usb_handoff_xhci(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> >>                       /* We're reading garbage from the controller */
>> >>                       dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
>> >>                                "xHCI controller failing to respond");
>> >> -                     return;
>> >> +                     goto iounmap;
>> >>               }
>> >>
>> >>               if (!ext_cap_offset)
>> >> @@ -1061,7 +1061,7 @@ hc_init:
>> >>                        "xHCI HW did not halt within %d usec status = 0x%x\n",
>> >>                        XHCI_MAX_HALT_USEC, val);
>> >>       }
>> >> -
>> >> +iounmap:
>> >>       iounmap(base);
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >
>> > Does not apply to the tree :(
>>
>>
>> This patch applies fine on top of
>> "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git".
>> Just now only I have re-verified.
>> Am I expected to send this patch on top of some other git tree/branch ?
>
> It will end up going in the usb.git tree, on the usb-next branch, and it
> conflicts with other xhci patches that just landed there ahead of yours.
> So it's not your fault, you did the right thing, just others also did
> work here so you need to redo yours as well, a normal thing in kernel
> development :)
>
> hope this helps explain things.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/