[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151202165637.GA20840@mail.hallyn.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:56:37 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>, serge@...lyn.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, adityakali@...gle.com,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, lxc-devel@...ts.linuxcontainers.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] cgroup: mount cgroupns-root when inside non-init
cgroupns
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:53:12AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Serge.
>
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:58:53PM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > I mispoke before though - it's not the hierarchy's root dentry,
> > but rather a dentry for a descendent cgroup which will become the
> > root dentry for the new superblock. We do know that there must be
> > a css_set with a cgroup. I'm still trying to track down whether
> > that cgrou's inode's dentry can ever be flushed. I would think
> > not but am not sure.
>
> Hmmm... I'm not really following. The inode can be flushed and that's
> why it needs to be walked down from root. What am I missing here?
Can it be flushed when we know that the cgroup is being pinned by
a css_set? (There's either a task or a cgroup_namespace pinning it
or we wouldn't get here)
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists