[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151202165945.GN5072@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 17:59:45 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Wilck <Martin.Wilck@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] tpm_tis: Clean up force module parameter
Hello Greg,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 08:53:38AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:21:47AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > > These changes are complex enough they really shouldn't go into 4.4
> > > > unless absolutely necessary.
> > >
> > > The reasons I'm asking this are:
> > >
> > > * I'm planning to do v4.5 pull request soon.
> > > * If this need to be get this into v4.4, we should act fast. Given the
> > > complexity of the changes I'd not recommend that unless it is a life
> > > and death question.
> >
> > I'd say we should repair b8b2c7d845d5 ("base/platform: assert that
> > dev_pm_domain callbacks are called unconditionally") for 4.4-rc$next and
> > live with the problem that the tpm driver had since long another
> > release.
>
> I was going to queue up
> Subject: [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe function is NULL
>
> for 4.4-final, unless you all object to that.
Martin is about to send a v3 of this patch, please pick up this v3
instead.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists