[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hzjMkwx3AA+f5Y9zfp-egjO-b5+_EU7cGO5BGMQaiN_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 19:45:01 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
mauricio.porto@....com, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix mmap MAP_POPULATE for DAX pmd mapping
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 14:08 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com> wrote:
>> > The following oops was observed when mmap() with MAP_POPULATE
>> > pre-faulted pmd mappings of a DAX file. follow_trans_huge_pmd()
>> > expects that a target address has a struct page.
>> >
>> > BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffea0012220000
>> > follow_trans_huge_pmd+0xba/0x390
>> > follow_page_mask+0x33d/0x420
>> > __get_user_pages+0xdc/0x800
>> > populate_vma_page_range+0xb5/0xe0
>> > __mm_populate+0xc5/0x150
>> > vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0xe0
>> > SyS_mmap_pgoff+0x1c1/0x290
>> > SyS_mmap+0x1b/0x30
>> >
>> > Fix it by making the PMD pre-fault handling consistent with PTE.
>> > After pre-faulted in faultin_page(), follow_page_mask() calls
>> > follow_trans_huge_pmd(), which is changed to call follow_pfn_pmd()
>> > for VM_PFNMAP or VM_MIXEDMAP. follow_pfn_pmd() handles FOLL_TOUCH
>> > and returns with -EEXIST.
>> >
>> > Reported-by: Mauricio Porto <mauricio.porto@....com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
>> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> > Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
>> > Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
>> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>> > Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
>> > ---
>>
>> Hey Toshi,
>>
>> I ended up fixing this differently with follow_pmd_devmap() introduced
>> in this series:
>>
>> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2015-November/003033.html
>>
>> Does the latest libnvdimm-pending branch [1] pass your test case?
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> I ran several test cases, and they all hit the case "pfn not in memmap" in
> __dax_pmd_fault() during mmap(MAP_POPULATE). Looking at the dax.pfn, PFN_DEV is
> set but PFN_MAP is not. I have not looked into why, but I thought I let you
> know first. I've also seen the test thread got hung up at the end sometime.
That PFN_MAP flag will not be set by default for NFIT-defined
persistent memory. See pmem_should_map_pages() for pmem namespaces
that will have it set by default, currently only e820 type-12 memory
ranges.
NFIT-defined persistent memory can have a memmap array dynamically
allocated by setting up a pfn device (similar to setting up a btt).
We don't map it by default because the NFIT may describe hundreds of
gigabytes of persistent and the overhead of the memmap may be too
large to locate the memmap in ram.
I have a pending patch in libnvdimm-pending that allows the capacity
for the memmap to come from pmem instead of ram:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/djbw/nvdimm.git/commit/?h=libnvdimm-pending&id=3117a24e07fe
> I also noticed that reason is not set in the case below.
>
> if (length < PMD_SIZE
> || (pfn_t_to_pfn(dax.pfn) & PG_PMD_COLOUR)) {
> dax_unmap_atomic(bdev, &dax);
> goto fallback;
> }
Thanks, I'll fix that up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists