[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1449084362.31589.37.camel@hpe.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:26:02 -0700
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
mauricio.porto@....com, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fix mmap MAP_POPULATE for DAX pmd mapping
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 10:06 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com> wrote:
> > > Oh, I see. I will setup the memmap array and run the tests again.
> > >
> > > But, why does the PMD mapping depend on the memmap array? We have
> > > observed major performance improvement with PMD. This feature should
> > > always be enabled with DAX regardless of the option to allocate the memmap
> > > array.
> > >
> >
> > Several factors drove this decision, I'm open to considering
> > alternatives but here's the reasoning:
> >
> > 1/ DAX pmd mappings caused crashes in the get_user_pages path leading
> > to commit e82c9ed41e8 "dax: disable pmd mappings". The reason pte
> > mappings don't crash and instead trigger -EFAULT is due to the
> > _PAGE_SPECIAL pte bit.
> >
> > 2/ To enable get_user_pages for DAX, in both the page and huge-page
> > case, we need a new pte bit _PAGE_DEVMAP.
> >
> > 3/ Given the pte bits are hard to come I'm assuming we won't get two,
> > i.e. both _PAGE_DEVMAP and a new _PAGE_SPECIAL for pmds. Even if we
> > could get a _PAGE_SPECIAL for pmds I'm not in favor of pursuing it.
>
> Actually, Dave says they aren't that hard to come by for pmds, so we
> could go add _PMD_SPECIAL if we really wanted to support the limited
> page-less DAX-pmd case.
>
> But I'm still of the opinion that we run away from the page-less case
> until it can be made a full class citizen with O_DIRECT for pfn
> support.
I may be missing something, but per vm_normal_page(), I think _PAGE_SPECIAL can
be substituted by the following check when we do not have the memmap.
if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP) ||
((vma->vm_flags & VM_MIXEDMAP) && (!pfn_valid(pfn)))) {
This is what I did in this patch for follow_trans_huge_pmd(), although I missed
the pfn_valid() check.
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists