[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151203063504.GA14699@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 22:35:04 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] clk: let of_clk_get_parent_name() fail for invalid
clock-indices
On 12/03, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Currently, of_clk_get_parent_name() returns a wrong parent clock name
> when "clock-indices" property exists and the target index is not
> found in the property. In this case, NULL should be returned.
>
> For example,
>
> oscillator {
> compatible = "myclocktype";
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> clock-indices = <1>, <3>;
> clock-output-names = "clka", "clkb";
> };
>
> consumer {
> compatible = "myclockconsumer";
> clocks = <&oscillator 0>, <&oscillator 1>;
> };
>
> Currently, of_clk_get_parent_name(consumer_np, 0) returns "clka"
> (and of_clk_get_parent_name(consumer_np, 1) also returns "clka",
> this is correct). Because the "clock-indices" in the clock parent
> does not contain <0>, of_clk_get_parent_name(consumer_np, 0) should
> return NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists