lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151203093525.GQ17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:35:25 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Clear the root_domain cpumasks in
 init_rootdomain()

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 10:44:08AM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:

> > Nice, will you be looking for similar issues elsewhere in the scheduler
> > too?
> 
> Sure :-)

Thanks!

> >>> in alloc_rootdomain() ?
> >> There is a "memset(rd, 0, sizeof(*rd))" in init_rootdomain(),
> >> so I don't think we need to do this in alloc_rootdomain().
> > Ah, right there is. Which also clears the mask for small systems.
> 
> Yeah, maybe we can improve it using alloc_cpumask_var() with
> __GFP_ZERO instead of zalloc_cpumask_var() to avoid duplicate
> clean for small systems.

This isn't a performance critical path, so clarity and correctness are
more important than performance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ