linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151203095726.GA15428@lst.de>
Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:57:26 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Matias Bjørling <m@...rling.me>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 10:52:46AM +0100, Matias Bjørling wrote:
> The identify geometry command and bad block commands are part of the admin 
> command set. Surely, as all these take a ns id, they can be moved and be 
> accessed naturally through the user queues.

Nah, these admin commands should go through the admin queue - but
having a request_queue as the argument to the callback just seems rather
off if it's not the right one.  Why can't you just pass the 'struct nvm_dev'
instead of the request_queue for these methods?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/