[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151203103703.GC2097@ubuntu>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:07:03 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Ben Gamari <ben@...rt-cactus.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de>,
Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and
5422
On 03-12-15, 11:26, Ben Gamari wrote:
> Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> writes:
> > But, before I start reviewing this series, I have few comments.
> > - We weren't able to use cpufreq-dt driver for big LITTLE platforms
> > earlier, as it never had multi cluster support and we wanted
> > clock-sharing information via DT.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> > - That is all fixed now.
>
> I did not see any mention of this in the cpufreq-dt driver binding
> documentation, otherwise I would have tried going this route.
>
> Do you have any references? I'd be happy to examine what would be
> necessary to go this route although, being an independent contributor,
> it may take time.
You wouldn't find in cpufreq-dt documentation as its not specific to
that. I have seen you DT patches now, and you have created the OPP
tables mostly correctly. Just create the cpufreq-platform device for
cpufreq-dt instead of arm-big-little one. And it should just work.
> > - I want Samsung's big LITTLE platforms to use cpufreq-dt and drop
> > arm_big_little driver completely.
>
> That sounds like a great direction going forward. However, I would still
> kindly request that you consider this series.
>
> The existence of future plans of course does not change the fact that
> users have real hardware today; hardware that they have spent money on
> and would like to use. Cpufreq support has already been deferred once
> for similar reasons of interface churn which essentially forestalled
> working functionality from entering the kernel by eight months; I'd
> really like to avoid having this happen again.
I am not talking about any future plans here that need some work to be
done. Its all working today, you just need to use a different driver.
> Sounds reasonable to me. However, I'd just like to reiterate that this
> line of work can be pursued independently from the upstreaming of this
> series.
I think this is the right time to upstream the right solution. Just
try it once, if you face lots of difficulties or issues, then we can
ofcourse see..
NOTE: Check how OPP nodes are required to be created now in
linux-next. They should be named like opp@<freq-hz>. Something I
noticed in your DTs.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists