[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151203121303.GK10747@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:13:03 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pinskia@...il.com,
Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com, schwab@...e.de,
Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com, agraf@...e.de, klimov.linux@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, jan.dakinevich@...il.com,
ddaney.cavm@...il.com, bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com,
philipp.tomsich@...obroma-systems.com, andrey.konovalov@...aro.org,
joseph@...esourcery.com, christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/19] arm64: introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread
(for AArch32 compat)
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:16:47AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> index 7fbed69..9700e5e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> @@ -299,19 +299,44 @@ struct compat_shmid64_ds {
> compat_ulong_t __unused5;
> };
>
> -static inline int is_compat_task(void)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AARCH32_EL0
> +
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_task(void)
> {
> return test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT);
> }
>
> -static inline int is_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> {
> return test_ti_thread_flag(thread, TIF_32BIT);
> }
>
> +#else
> +
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_task(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static inline int is_compat_task(void)
> +{
> + return is_a32_compat_task();
> +}
> +
> #else /* !CONFIG_COMPAT */
>
> -static inline int is_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_task(void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
My main worry with this patch is a potential #include mess. I can see
that you already had to include asm/compat.h explicitly in
hw_breakpoint.c even though linux/compat.h was already included. In
subsequent files (asm/elf.h, asm/memory.h) you check is_compat_task()
without explicitly including asm/compat.h and hope that it won't break.
A solution would be to add these functions in a separate header file
that gets included where needed (also by asm/compat.h).
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists