linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND v4 2/6] remoteproc: debugfs: Add ability to boot remote processor using debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:03:41 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>,
	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, kernel@...inux.com,
	Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ludovic.barre@...com, Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND v4 2/6] remoteproc: debugfs: Add ability to boot remote
 processor using debugfs

On Thu, 03 Dec 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Thursday 03 December 2015 12:26:34 Lee Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +static ssize_t rproc_state_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *userbuf,
> > > > +                                size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       struct rproc *rproc = filp->private_data;
> > > > +       char buf[10];
> > > > +       int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +       if (count > sizeof(buf))
> > > > +               return count;
> > > > +       ret = copy_from_user(buf, userbuf, count);
> > > > +       if (ret)
> > > > +               return -EFAULT;
> > > > +
> > > > +       if (buf[count - 1] == '\n')
> > > > +               buf[count - 1] = '\0';
> > > 
> > > I believe you can get here with count = 0.
> > 
> > I'm pretty sure you can't.
> > 
> > If you are sure that you can, if you can provide me with a way of
> > testing, I'd be happy to put in provisions.
> > 
> 
> I think that a zero-length write() from user space ends up in the write
> file operation.

I tested this and didn't see it enter write().  My conclusion was that
if the file doesn't change, then nothing is triggered.

> Also, we get a gcc warning about the out-of-bounds access for code like
> this, and checking that count is larger than zero avoids the warning.

I did however see this warning and wondered what it was talking
about.  Thanks for clarifying.  Will fix.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/