linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 net 0/6] Marvell Armada XP/370/38X Neta fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <874mfz1wd2.fsf@free-electrons.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 Dec 2015 14:43:05 +0100
From:	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	mw@...ihalf.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
	andrew@...n.ch, jason@...edaemon.net,
	thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, simon.guinot@...uanux.org,
	nadavh@...vell.com, alior@...vell.com, xswang@...vell.com,
	myair@...vell.com, nitroshift@...oo.com, jaz@...ihalf.com,
	tn@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net 0/6] Marvell Armada XP/370/38X Neta fixes

Hi David,
 
 On mer., déc. 02 2015, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 09:16:06 +0100
>
>> Hi David,
>>  
>>  On mer., déc. 02 2015, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> From: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:27:40 +0100
>>>
>>>> I'm sending v4 with corrected commit log of the last patch, in order
>>>> to avoid possible conflicts between the branches as suggested by
>>>> Gregory Clement.
>>>
>>> Series applied, thanks.
>> 
>> Could you confirm that you don't apply the last patch?
>
> If I say it's applied then it's applied, and if you don't like it then
> you'll have to submit a revert patch against my tree or similar.
>
> You know you could just check my tree instead of asking.

Well I was very surprised that you applied a patch in a subsystem that
you do not maintain. As written on the lines just below yours, the
purpose of this v4 was to make clear that the last patch is not for the
net subsystem but for the arm/mvebu one.

As this series will be part of the next rc, then I hope we won't have
conflicts during next merge.

Gregory


-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/