[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56605A5B.6000506@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:06:03 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv1] x86: rtc_cmos platform device requires
legacy irqs
On 03/12/15 11:23, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com> writes:
>
>> Adding the rtc platform device when there are no legacy irqs (no
>> legacy PIC)
>
> No PIC != No legacy IRQs, Hyper-V Gen2 represents such a platform (and
> it has RTC on irq8). I've tested this patch against it and it appears to
> work because the device is present in ACPI and we initialize it in
> drivers/acpi/acpi_cmos_rtc.c, add_rtc_cmos() bails out in the very
> beginning as we see PNP0b00 device.
It's not a legacy IRQ if it isn't going via the legacy PIC, it just
happens to have the same number.
I think it is safe to assume that any machine with a CMOS RTC but no PNP
information is also going to have a legacy PIC.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists