linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] linux/log2.h: Fix roundup_pow_of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPAsAGwZzopfbz6+5Qw7CnVWsFtptO6eoeekb7AcV04q0yqeOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 19:15:35 +0300
From:	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>
To:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/log2.h: Fix roundup_pow_of_two(0)

2015-12-03 19:04 GMT+03:00 Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>:
> On 12/03/2015 10:39 AM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> 2015-12-03 18:30 GMT+03:00 Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>:
>>> > Passing 0 to roundup_pow_of_two would lead to wrapping around and trying to
>>> > find the last set bit on (unsigned long)(-1), which is obviously wrong.
>>> >
>>> > Instead, deal with this case by rounding it up to the closest power of two
>>> > (2 ** 0).
>>> >
>>> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
>>> > ---
>>> >  include/linux/log2.h |    3 +++
>>> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>> >
>>> > diff --git a/include/linux/log2.h b/include/linux/log2.h
>>> > index fd7ff3d..b6bdf0c 100644
>>> > --- a/include/linux/log2.h
>>> > +++ b/include/linux/log2.h
>>> > @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ bool is_power_of_2(unsigned long n)
>>> >  static inline __attribute__((const))
>>> >  unsigned long __roundup_pow_of_two(unsigned long n)
>>> >  {
>>> > +       if (n == 0)
>>> > +               return 1UL << 0;
>>> > +
>> Perhaps we should fix callers instead?
>> Comment near roundup_pow_of_two() says that result is undefined when n == 0:
>
> That's how I've started doing it, but when it showed up with 3 different callers
> I figured it's better to fix it at the source.
>
> This fix would return a valid value and is working fine with the callers.
>

In that case patch should update the comment.

> Thanks,
> Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/