linux-kernel - Re: [RFC2 PATCH v6 00/19] ILP32 for ARM64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151203175955.GP10747@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 17:59:55 +0000
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc:	arnd@...db.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pinskia@...il.com,
	Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com, schwab@...e.de,
	Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com, agraf@...e.de, klimov.linux@...il.com,
	broonie@...nel.org, jan.dakinevich@...il.com,
	ddaney.cavm@...il.com, bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com,
	philipp.tomsich@...obroma-systems.com, andrey.konovalov@...aro.org,
	joseph@...esourcery.com, christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com
Subject: Re: [RFC2 PATCH v6 00/19] ILP32 for ARM64

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:16:40AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
>  - ILP32 VDSO code excluded. It's not mandatory, and caused questions
>    during review process. We definitely make sure we will follow up
>    with a VDSO later on because it is needed for performance reasons;

I already asked in one of the patches, don't you need a VDSO for
sigreturn?

> The full regression table is:
> 		ILP32		LP64
> 
> float_bessel    FAIL	 134    PASSED	0
> float_exp_log   FAIL	 134    PASSED	0
> float_iperb     FAIL	 134    PASSED	0
> float_power     FAIL	 134    PASSED	0
> float_trigo     FAIL	 134    PASSED	0
> abort01         FAIL       2    FAIL 	2
> fcntl14         FAIL       2    FAIL 	2
> kill11          FAIL       2    FAIL 	2
> mmap16          FAIL       6    PASSED	0
> open12          FAIL       2    PASSED	0
> pause01         PASSED     0    FAIL 	9
> pipe07          FAIL       2    PASSED	0
> readdir01       FAIL       1    PASSED	0
> rename11        FAIL       2    PASSED	0
> rmdir02         FAIL       2    PASSED	0
> setregid02      FAIL       1    FAIL 	1
> settimeofday01  FAIL       1    FAIL 	1
> umount2_01      FAIL       2    PASSED	0
> umount2_02      FAIL       2    PASSED	0
> umount2_03      FAIL       2    PASSED	0
> utime06         FAIL       2    PASSED	0

Have you run any AArch32 LTP with these patches? The results should also
be included in your table above.

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/