lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 18:22:27 +0000
From:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:	Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
Cc:	zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
	will.deacon@....com, lauraa@...eaurora.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	guohanjun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: calculate the various pages number to show

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 09:52:16AM +0800, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2015/11/26 23:49, Mark Rutland wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:05:32PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> >> On 2015/11/25 23:04, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:41:12PM +0800, zhongjiang wrote:
> >>>> This patch add the interface to show the number of 4KB or 64KB page,
> >>>> aims to statistics the number of different types of pages.
> >>>
> >>> What is this useful for? Why do we want it?
> >>>
> >>> What does it account for, just the swapper?
> >>>
> >>
> >> The patch is wirtten when I was in backport set_memory_ro. It can be used to
> >> detect whether there is a large page spliting and merging. large page will
> >> significantly reduce the TLB miss, and improve the system performance.
> > 
> > Ok, but typically the user isn't going to be able to do much with this
> > information. It feels more like something that should be in the page
> > table dump code (where we can calculate the values as we walk the
> > tables).
> > 
> > What is it intended to account for?
> > 
> > The entire swapper?
> > 
> > Just the linear mapping?
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> x86 has this information when cat /proc/meminfo, so how about just
> like x86 to show it?

The fact that another architecture has some implementation doesn't
necessarily mean it's a good idea. In this case there are concerns that
don't apply to x86, in that we support a number of page sizes, and
anything reading this needs to handle that fact.

If there's a sensible use-case, then I am not opposed to this. I don't
see the point in adding it just because we can.

A prerequisite for adding it is knowing precisely what it is intended to
describe. Otherwise it's impossible to review.

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ