[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56608BA2.2050300@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:36:18 -0800
From: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@...aro.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/7] mm/gup: add gup trace points
On 12/2/2015 8:13 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:36:50 -0800
> Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/02/2015 02:53 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
>>> index deafa2c..10245a4 100644
>>> --- a/mm/gup.c
>>> +++ b/mm/gup.c
>>> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
>>> #include <linux/rwsem.h>
>>> #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
>>>
>>> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>>> +#include <trace/events/gup.h>
>>> +
>>> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>>> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>>
>> This needs to be _the_ last thing that gets #included. Otherwise, you
>> risk colliding with any other trace header that gets implicitly included
>> below.
>
> Agreed.
>
>>
>>> @@ -1340,6 +1346,8 @@ int __get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages, int write,
>>> start, len)))
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> + trace_gup_get_user_pages_fast(start, nr_pages, write, pages);
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * Disable interrupts. We use the nested form as we can already have
>>> * interrupts disabled by get_futex_key.
>>
>> It would be _really_ nice to be able to see return values from the
>> various gup calls as well. Is that feasible?
>
> Only if you rewrite the functions to have a single return code path
> that we can add a tracepoint too. Or have a wrapper function that gets
Yes. My preliminary test just could cover the success case. gup could
return errno from different a few code path.
> called directly that calls these functions internally and the tracepoint
> can trap the return value.
This will incur more changes in other subsystems (futex, kvm, etc), I'm
not sure if it is worth making such changes to get return value.
> I can probably make function_graph tracer give return values, although
> it will give a return value for void functions as well. And it may give
> long long returns for int returns that may have bogus data in the
> higher bits.
If the return value requirement is not limited to gup, the approach
sounds more reasonable.
Thanks,
Yang
>
> -- Steve
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists