[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPAsAGyXcsGrneze--o+F=tJpV4cmdgfB-MxZ5S3yB10nG+v3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 22:18:05 +0300
From: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Yury Gribov <y.gribov@...sung.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL BUILD + fi..." <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mac80211: Prevent build failure with CONFIG_UBSAN=y
2015-12-03 20:05 GMT+03:00 Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>:
> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 18:50 +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> With upcoming CONFIG_UBSAN the following BUILD_BUG_ON in
>> net/mac80211/debugfs.c starts to trigger:
>> BUILD_BUG_ON(hw_flag_names[NUM_IEEE80211_HW_FLAGS] != (void
>> *)0x1);
>>
>> It seems, that compiler instrumentation causes some code
>> deoptimizations.
>> Because of that GCC is not being able to resolve condition in
>> BUILD_BUG_ON()
>> at compile time.
>>
>> We could make size of hw_flag_names array unspecified and replace the
>> condition in BUILD_BUG_ON() with following:
>> ARRAY_SIZE(hw_flag_names) != NUM_IEEE80211_HW_FLAGS
>>
>> That will have the same effect as before (adding new flag without
>> updating
>> array will trigger build failure) except it doesn't fail with
>> CONFIG_UBSAN.
>> As a bonus this patch slightly decreases size of hw_flag_names array.
>>
> Seems fine, would you want to take it through some other tree together
> with UBSAN, or do you expect that to still take long enough to allow
> this to trickle through our trees?
>
I expect that Andrew will take it with UBSAN for 4.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists