linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sched/fair: Move hot load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56609E75.4080407@hpe.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 Dec 2015 14:56:37 -0500
From:	Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sched/fair: Move hot load_avg into its own cacheline

On 12/03/2015 06:12 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> I made this:
>
> ---
> Subject: sched/fair: Move hot load_avg into its own cacheline
> From: Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@....com>
> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:41:49 -0500
>
> If a system with large number of sockets was driven to full
> utilization, it was found that the clock tick handling occupied a
> rather significant proportion of CPU time when fair group scheduling
> and autogroup were enabled.
>
> Running a java benchmark on a 16-socket IvyBridge-EX system, the perf
> profile looked like:
>
>    10.52%   0.00%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] smp_apic_timer_interrupt
>     9.66%   0.05%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] hrtimer_interrupt
>     8.65%   0.03%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] tick_sched_timer
>     8.56%   0.00%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] update_process_times
>     8.07%   0.03%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] scheduler_tick
>     6.91%   1.78%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] task_tick_fair
>     5.24%   5.04%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] update_cfs_shares
>
> In particular, the high CPU time consumed by update_cfs_shares()
> was mostly due to contention on the cacheline that contained the
> task_group's load_avg statistical counter. This cacheline may also
> contains variables like shares, cfs_rq&  se which are accessed rather
> frequently during clock tick processing.
>
> This patch moves the load_avg variable into another cacheline
> separated from the other frequently accessed variables. It also
> creates a cacheline aligned kmemcache for task_group to make sure
> that all the allocated task_group's are cacheline aligned.
>
> By doing so, the perf profile became:
>
>     9.44%   0.00%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] smp_apic_timer_interrupt
>     8.74%   0.01%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] hrtimer_interrupt
>     7.83%   0.03%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] tick_sched_timer
>     7.74%   0.00%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] update_process_times
>     7.27%   0.03%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] scheduler_tick
>     5.94%   1.74%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] task_tick_fair
>     4.15%   3.92%  java   [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] update_cfs_shares
>
> The %cpu time is still pretty high, but it is better than before. The
> benchmark results before and after the patch was as follows:
>
>    Before patch - Max-jOPs: 907533    Critical-jOps: 134877
>    After patch  - Max-jOPs: 916011    Critical-jOps: 142366
>
> Cc: Scott J Norton<scott.norton@....com>
> Cc: Douglas Hatch<doug.hatch@....com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar<mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Yuyang Du<yuyang.du@...el.com>
> Cc: Paul Turner<pjt@...gle.com>
> Cc: Ben Segall<bsegall@...gle.com>
> Cc: Morten Rasmussen<morten.rasmussen@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long<Waiman.Long@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)<peterz@...radead.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449081710-20185-3-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com
> ---
>   kernel/sched/core.c  |   10 +++++++---
>   kernel/sched/sched.h |    7 ++++++-
>   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -7345,6 +7345,9 @@ int in_sched_functions(unsigned long add
>    */
>   struct task_group root_task_group;
>   LIST_HEAD(task_groups);
> +
> +/* Cacheline aligned slab cache for task_group */
> +static struct kmem_cache *task_group_cache __read_mostly;
>   #endif
>
>   DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, load_balance_mask);
> @@ -7402,11 +7405,12 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
>   #endif /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
>
>   #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
> +	task_group_cache = KMEM_CACHE(task_group, 0);
> +
Thanks for making that change.

Do we need to add the flag SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN? Or we could make a helper 
flag that define SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN if CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED is 
defined. Other than that, I am fine with the change.

Cheers,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/