linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] workqueue: warn if memory reclaim tries to flush !WQ_MEM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151203210911.GZ17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 22:09:11 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: warn if memory reclaim tries to flush
 !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueue

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:56:32PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> So, if I'm not mistaken, those are all marking tasks which can be
> depended upon during memory reclaim and we do want to catch them all.

Up to a point yes, these are things that want to be reliable during
reclaim, but lacking memory reserves and usage bounds (which we
discussed last at lsf/mm) these are just wanna-be.

> PF_MEMALLOC shouldn't depend on something which require memory to be
> reclaimed to guarantee forward progress.

PF_MEMALLOC basically avoids reclaim for any memory allocation while its
set.

The thing is, even if your workqueue has WQ_MEM_RECLAIM set, it will not
hit the mayday button until you're completely full flat out of memory.
At which point you're probably boned anyway, because, as per the above,
all that code assumes there's _some_ memory to be had.

One solution is to always fail maybe_create_worker() when PF_MEMALLOC is
set, thus always hitting the mayday button.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/