[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0C18FE92A7765D4EB9EE5D38D86A563A01DE83B2@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 04:23:09 +0000
From: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>
To: John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>
CC: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] Two fix for dwc2 gadget driver
> On 11/29/2015 9:29 PM, changbin.du@...el.com wrote:
> > From: "Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@...el.com>
> >
> > With the first patch, enable a enabled ep will return -EBUSY.
> > The second patch forbid queuing on disabled ep to avoid panic.
>
>
> The usb_ep->enabled flag was added in 4.4.
>
> It looks like these same checks are also added at the API level in the
> usb_ep_enable() and usb_ep_disable().
>
> In case this is bypassed we should probably add them in the gadget
> anyways but using the existing flag.
>
> Regards,
> John
>
Hmm, just learnt the flag on gadget API layer. And I just see usb_ep_enable return success if it is already enabled.
But I think it should return an error to inform the caller. Because the ep configuration may probably be changed.
In this case, usb_ep_enable will do different behavior.
Hmm, the usb_ep_queue doesn't check the enabled flag. Should be added. Let me have a try.
Best Regards,
Changbin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists