[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5661B033.10503@citrix.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 15:24:35 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>, <x86@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv1] x86: rtc_cmos platform device requires
legacy irqs
On 04/12/15 14:06, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 03/12/15 10:43, David Vrabel wrote:
>> Adding the rtc platform device when there are no legacy irqs (no
>> legacy PIC) causes a conflict with other devices that end up using the
>> same irq number.
>
> An alternative is to remove the rtc_cmos platform device in Xen PV
> guests.
>
> Any preference on how this regression should be fixed?
>
> David
>
> 8<--------------------------
> x86: Xen PV guests don't have the rtc_cmos platform device
>
[...]
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
> @@ -200,6 +200,9 @@ static __init int add_rtc_cmos(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> + if (xen_pv_domain())
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
Note there's a missing include that breaks !XEN builds.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists