[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151204160128.GA24431@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 11:01:28 -0500
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: memcg uncharge page counter mismatch
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:47:29PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 79a29d564bff..143c933f0b81 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -4895,6 +4895,14 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
> switch (get_mctgt_type(vma, addr, ptent, &target)) {
> case MC_TARGET_PAGE:
> page = target.page;
> + /*
> + * We can have a part of the split pmd here. Moving it
> + * can be done but it would be too convoluted so simply
> + * ignore such a partial THP and keep it in original
> + * memcg. There should be somebody mapping the head.
> + */
> + if (PageCompound(page))
> + goto put;
> if (isolate_lru_page(page))
> goto put;
> if (!mem_cgroup_move_account(page, false,
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
The charge moving concept is fundamentally flawed and its
implementation here is incomplete and races with reclaim.
Really, nobody should be using this. Absent any actual regression
reports, a minimal fix to stop this code from generating warnings
should be enough.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists