linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] of: Check for overlap in reserved memory regions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:27:50 -0800
From:	Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@...eaurora.org>
To:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: Check for overlap in reserved memory regions

On Thu, Nov 12 2015 at 01:19:59 PM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 18:30 -0700, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
>
>> Any overlap in the reserved memory regions (those specified in the
>> reserved-memory DT node) is a bug.
>
> Can you expand a bit on why you think it's a bug? I assume it was discussed at
> some point on the list but I didn't see it sorry.

The reason I think it's a bug is because the overlapping memory could be
handed out to multiple firmwares, which generally ends in "random"
firmware crashes.  We've found by sad experience that root-causing such
a crash can be quite difficult.

Is there a valid use case for overlapping regions?  I can't think of
one...

> There's nothing I can see in the binding document[1] about whether regions can
> overlap, or what it would mean if they did.

You're right, the bindings document doesn't say anything about
overlapping memory regions.  I can submit something unless someone comes
up with a reason why we should allow overlapping memory regions.

> If we want to declare that overlapping regions are always a bug then there
> should be some text in the binding explaining that. There's also the
> possibility that we have existing device trees in the wild that contain
> overlapping regions, and whether we think it's OK to retrospectively declare
> that they're incorrect.

I did a quick survey of in-tree users of reserved-memory and couldn't
find any overlapping regions.


-Mitch

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/