[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5661CE71.5050206@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:33:37 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: fix pinctrl driver selection
On 04/12/15 17:18, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
>
> Move the selection of the pinctrl driver to SoC family level since we
> have two pinctrl drivers. It is useless to select one which is not
> compatible with the SoC.
>
> [abelloni: fixed pm.c when only sama2d2 is selected]
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 6 +++++-
> arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 7 ++++++-
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> index 80e277cfcc8b..01cbb17e6f6b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> @@ -41,8 +41,10 @@
> * implementation should be moved down into the pinctrl driver and get
> * called as part of the generic suspend/resume path.
> */
> +#ifdef PINCTRL_AT91
Accidentally glanced at this patch when my mail client got hung at this
patch :), I think you mean CONFIG_PINCTRL_AT91 here and later below.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists