[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151204180426.GM21177@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 19:04:26 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Amy Wiles <amy.l.wiles@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/rapl: Do not load in a guest
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:46:42AM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> Since RAPL is not architectural, consistency of hw support needs lots
> of improvement at the least.
It should have received a CPUID bit, no matter if it is architectural or
not.
> This error message is valid in other than VM. Domain detection error
> already propagated.
Huh, didn't I say that?
> This is good for the first level RAPL detection. The only way is to
> base detection on known CPU models.
...and yet Hannes sees it on a minnowboard. CCed.
The CPU model-based detection is ugly and does not always work, as
you see.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists