[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151205163622.GA2237@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 08:36:22 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] device core: add BUS_NOTIFY_DRIVER_NOT_BOUND
notification
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 06:24:05PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:49:17PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> The users of BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER have no chance to do any cleanup in case of
> >> a probe failure. In the result there might be problems, such as some resources
> >> that had been allocated will continue to be allocated and therefore lead to a
> >> resource leak.
> >>
> >> Introduce a new notification to inform the subscriber that ->probe() failed. Do
> >> the same in case of failed device_bind_driver() call.
> >
> > Ugh, I hate all these notifiers, but this one does make sense...
>
> Yeah, I'm not a fan of them either.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
> You meant Acked-by, didn't you?
Either works :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists