[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1512051811320.3595@nanos>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 18:12:57 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86: ftrace: fix the comments for
ftrace_modify_code_direct
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Li Bin wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> @@ -106,13 +106,12 @@ ftrace_modify_code_direct(unsigned long ip, unsigned const char *old_code,
> unsigned char replaced[MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE];
>
> /*
> - * Note: Due to modules and __init, code can
> - * disappear and change, we need to protect against faulting
> - * as well as code changing. We do this by using the
> - * probe_kernel_* functions.
> - *
> - * No real locking needed, this code is run through
> - * kstop_machine, or before SMP starts.
> + * Note:
> + * We are paranoid about modifying text, as if a bug were to happen, it
> + * could cause us to read or write to someplace that could cause harm.
> + * Carefully read and modify the code with aarch64_insn_*() which uses
aarch64_insn_() is related to x86 in which way?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists