linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86/cpufeature: Remove unused and seldomly used cpu_has

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151205200313.GB18105@pd.tnic>
Date:	Sat, 5 Dec 2015 21:03:13 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
	Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86/cpufeature: Remove unused and seldomly used
 cpu_has_xx macros

On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 08:59:45PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > -#define cpu_has_ht		boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HT)
> 
> tip/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h: In function ‘cpu_has_ht_siblings’:
> tip/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h:28:17: error: ‘cpu_has_ht’ undeclared (first use in this function)
>   has_siblings = cpu_has_ht && smp_num_siblings > 1;

Yeah, this series needs to go ontop of

ed29210cd6a6 ("x86: Remove unused function cpu_has_ht_siblings()")

which is in tip/x86/cleanups.

BTW, thanks for taking a look, I'll send an updated one removing the
static_cpu_has_safe() calls as you suggested in your other mail.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/