[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151205005937.GF22936@earth>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 01:59:37 +0100
From: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@...sung.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] power: Fix unmet dependency on POWER_SUPPLY by
POWER_RESET by uncoupling them
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:59:06PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Actually reset/power off handlers do not really depend on power supply.
> Move the power reset out of power supply block so it will appear in main
> drivers section. This fixes following build warning (encountered on ARM
> exynos defconfig when POWER_SUPPLY is disabled manually):
>
> warning: (ARCH_HISI && ARCH_INTEGRATOR && ARCH_EXYNOS && ARCH_VEXPRESS && REALVIEW_DT) selects POWER_RESET which has unmet direct dependencies (POWER_SUPPLY)
> warning: (ARCH_EXYNOS) selects POWER_RESET_SYSCON which has unmet direct dependencies (POWER_SUPPLY && POWER_RESET && OF)
> warning: (ARCH_EXYNOS) selects POWER_RESET_SYSCON_POWEROFF which has unmet direct dependencies (POWER_SUPPLY && POWER_RESET && OF)
nice catch. I don't really like the Makefile changes, though. I think
it would be better to make the power/ entry in drivers/Makefile into
"obj-y" and handle the details in drivers/power/Makefile.
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists