[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1449387307.3198.22.camel@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 23:35:07 -0800
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Cc: jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, shannon.nelson@...el.com,
carolyn.wyborny@...el.com, donald.c.skidmore@...el.com,
matthew.vick@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
mitch.a.williams@...el.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] fm10k:Fix error handling in the function
fm10k_resume
On Sat, 2015-12-05 at 21:36 -0500, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This fixes error handling to proper check if the call to the function
> fm10k_mbx_request_irq has failed by returning a error code and if
> so return immediately to the caller of fm10k_resume to properly
> signal a failure has occurred when accepting to resume this network
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Krishneil SIngh <krishneil.k.singh@...el.com
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Don't bother, David Miller has spoken and will not accept any patches
from you. So even though this was not properly sent to intel-wired-
lan@...ts.osuosl.org, which all kernel patches need to be sent to, I am
dropping this patch since David Miller will not accept ANY patches from
you.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists