linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] blkcipher: Copy iv from desc even for 0-len walks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1449366698-2422-1-git-send-email-Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date:	Sun,  6 Dec 2015 02:51:37 +0100
From:	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, martin@...ongswan.org
Cc:	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] blkcipher: Copy iv from desc even for 0-len walks

Some ciphers actually support encrypting zero length plaintexts. For
example, many AEAD modes support this. The resulting ciphertext for
those winds up being only the authentication tag, which is a result of
the key, the iv, the additional data, and the fact that the plaintext
had zero length. The blkcipher constructors won't copy the IV to the
right place, however, when using a zero length input, resulting in
some significant problems when ciphers call their initialization
routines, only to find that the ->iv parameter is uninitialized. One
such example of this would be using chacha20poly1305 with a zero length
input, which then calls chacha20, which calls the key setup routine,
which eventually OOPSes due to the uninitialized ->iv member.

Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
---
 crypto/ablkcipher.c | 2 +-
 crypto/blkcipher.c  | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/crypto/ablkcipher.c b/crypto/ablkcipher.c
index b4ffc5b..e5b5721 100644
--- a/crypto/ablkcipher.c
+++ b/crypto/ablkcipher.c
@@ -277,12 +277,12 @@ static int ablkcipher_walk_first(struct ablkcipher_request *req,
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq()))
 		return -EDEADLK;
 
+	walk->iv = req->info;
 	walk->nbytes = walk->total;
 	if (unlikely(!walk->total))
 		return 0;
 
 	walk->iv_buffer = NULL;
-	walk->iv = req->info;
 	if (unlikely(((unsigned long)walk->iv & alignmask))) {
 		int err = ablkcipher_copy_iv(walk, tfm, alignmask);
 
diff --git a/crypto/blkcipher.c b/crypto/blkcipher.c
index 11b9814..8cc1622 100644
--- a/crypto/blkcipher.c
+++ b/crypto/blkcipher.c
@@ -326,12 +326,12 @@ static int blkcipher_walk_first(struct blkcipher_desc *desc,
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq()))
 		return -EDEADLK;
 
+	walk->iv = desc->info;
 	walk->nbytes = walk->total;
 	if (unlikely(!walk->total))
 		return 0;
 
 	walk->buffer = NULL;
-	walk->iv = desc->info;
 	if (unlikely(((unsigned long)walk->iv & walk->alignmask))) {
 		int err = blkcipher_copy_iv(walk);
 		if (err)
-- 
2.6.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/