[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151206015656.GA29594@x>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 17:56:56 -0800
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/8] rcutorture: Print symbolic name for
->gp_state
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 05:54:36PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:04:21PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 04:23:50PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Currently, ->gp_state is printed as an integer, which slows debugging.
> > > This commit therefore prints a symbolic name in addition to the integer.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > [ Updated to fix relational operator called out by Dan Carpenter. ]
> > > ---
> > > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> > > kernel/rcu/tree.h | 9 +++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > index 7b78c88e19a3..491c99a73996 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > @@ -1187,6 +1187,16 @@ static void record_gp_stall_check_time(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /*
> > > + * Convert a ->gp_state value to a character string.
> > > + */
> > > +static char *gp_state_getname(short gs)
> >
> > Same comment about "const char *"
>
> Good point, fixed!
>
> > > +{
> > > + if (gs < 0 || gs >= ARRAY_SIZE(gp_state_names))
> > > + return "???";
> > > + return gp_state_names[gs];
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > * Complain about starvation of grace-period kthread.
> > > */
> > > static void rcu_check_gp_kthread_starvation(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> > > @@ -1197,10 +1207,11 @@ static void rcu_check_gp_kthread_starvation(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> > > j = jiffies;
> > > gpa = READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity);
> > > if (j - gpa > 2 * HZ) {
> > > - pr_err("%s kthread starved for %ld jiffies! g%lu c%lu f%#x s%d ->state=%#lx\n",
> > > + pr_err("%s kthread starved for %ld jiffies! g%lu c%lu f%#x %s(%d) ->state=%#lx\n",
> > > rsp->name, j - gpa,
> > > rsp->gpnum, rsp->completed,
> > > - rsp->gp_flags, rsp->gp_state,
> > > + rsp->gp_flags,
> > > + gp_state_getname(rsp->gp_state), rsp->gp_state,
> > > rsp->gp_kthread ? rsp->gp_kthread->state : ~0);
> > > if (rsp->gp_kthread)
> > > sched_show_task(rsp->gp_kthread);
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > > index f32bebb6bc90..f0304988e3f8 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > > @@ -544,6 +544,15 @@ struct rcu_state {
> > > #define RCU_GP_DOING_FQS 4 /* Wait done for force-quiescent-state time. */
> > > #define RCU_GP_CLEANUP 5 /* Grace-period cleanup started. */
> > > #define RCU_GP_CLEANED 6 /* Grace-period cleanup complete. */
> > > +static char * const gp_state_names[] = {
> >
> > Same comment about "const char * const", but also, should this really go
> > in a header file? Do any circumstances exist where this header could
> > get included in more than one source file in a given build? If so,
> > multiple copies of this array could potentially end up in the binary, if
> > the compiler fails to merge them.
>
> I added the const.
>
> However, I left the array in the .h file. The issue is that the #defines
> really have to be in the tree.h file. Given that, if I move the array
> elsewhere, they will very likely drift out of sync. So this sounds like
> a job for the compiler/linker...
>
> Ah, but there is another approach. It turns out that tree.h in included
> only from tree.c and tree_trace.c. And tree_trace.c defines a CPP symbol
> RCU_TREE_NONCORE that is used elsewhere in tree.h to keep tree_trace.c's
> mitts off a number of attractive but dangerous functions. So I just put
> the array under "#ifndef RCU_TREE_NONCORE".
>
> Fair enough?
Fair enough.
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists