[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mvtm9cty.fsf@smart-cactus.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 22:19:05 +0100
From: Ben Gamari <ben@...rt-cactus.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de>,
Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> writes:
> On 03-12-15, 11:26, Ben Gamari wrote:
>> Sounds reasonable to me. However, I'd just like to reiterate that this
>> line of work can be pursued independently from the upstreaming of this
>> series.
>
> I think this is the right time to upstream the right solution. Just
> try it once, if you face lots of difficulties or issues, then we can
> ofcourse see..
>
It looks like Bartlomiej has picked up this set. Regardless, while
tracking down various devicetree issues I noticed that the cpu-supply
and cpu%d-supply bindings appear to be completely undocumented. It
seem as though this ought to be fixed.
Cheers,
- Ben
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (473 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists