[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a8pmzly4.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 10:45:23 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, daniel@...ll.ch
Cc: a.hajda@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
airlied@...ux.ie, treding@...dia.com, l.stach@...gutronix.de,
robh@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/dsi: Try to match non-DT dsi devices
On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/30/2015 06:15 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> Hi Archit,
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on: v4.4-rc3]
>> [also build test ERROR on: next-20151127]
>>
>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Archit-Taneja/drm-dsi-DSI-for-devices-with-different-control-bus/20151130-200725
>> config: x86_64-allyesdebian (attached as .config)
>> reproduce:
>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> make ARCH=x86_64
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c: In function 'of_mipi_dsi_device_add':
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c:168:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_modalias_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> if (of_modalias_node(node, info.type, sizeof(info.type)) < 0) {
>
> Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI
> depend on CONFIG_OF?
Please don't.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists