[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151207085626.GA15567@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:56:26 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Wilck, Martin" <martin.wilck@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
"tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] tpm_tis: Clean up force module
parameter
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 09:06:50AM +0100, Wilck, Martin wrote:
> > > I'm a bit confused about the discussion because Martin replied that
> > > tpm_tis used to get the address range before applying this series.
> > >
> > > And pnp_driver in the backend for TPM 1.x devices grabs the address
> > > range from DSDT.
> >
> > You can completely ignore this question. I saw Martins reply with a fix for
> > "tpm_tis: Use devm_ioremap_resource" that you should squash into that
> > change. So it's proved that TPM ACPI device objects do not always have a
> > memory resource. Good.
>
> Repeat, the memory resource DOES exist on my system. Not sure what proof
> you saw there.
Ok, lets go this through.
I deduced this from two facts:
* It used to have memory resource as conditional and as a fallback use
fixed value.
* Your workaround reverted the situation to this.
Did I understand something incorrectly?
/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists