[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151207092747.GA11966@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:27:47 +0100
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Anton Bondarenko <anton.bondarenko.sama@...il.com>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, b38343@...escale.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com, jiada_wang@...tor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/11] spi: imx: Add support for loopback for ECSPI
controllers
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 05:57:03PM +0100, Anton Bondarenko wrote:
> Support for ECSPI loopback for IMX51, IMX53 and IMX6Q using TEST register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohsin Kazmi <mohsin_kazmi@...tor.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Bondarenko <anton.bondarenko.sama@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> index 363276d..3525616 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> @@ -246,6 +246,9 @@ static bool spi_imx_can_dma(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_device *spi,
> #define MX51_ECSPI_STAT 0x18
> #define MX51_ECSPI_STAT_RR (1 << 3)
>
> +#define MX51_ECSPI_TEST 0x20
> +#define MX51_ECSPI_LOOP BIT(31)
> +
> /* MX51 eCSPI */
> static unsigned int mx51_ecspi_clkdiv(unsigned int fin, unsigned int fspi,
> unsigned int *fres)
> @@ -316,6 +319,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused mx51_ecspi_config(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx,
> u32 ctrl = MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_ENABLE, cfg = 0, dma = 0;
> u32 tx_wml_cfg, rx_wml_cfg, rxt_wml_cfg;
> u32 clk = config->speed_hz, delay;
> + u32 lpb = 0;
>
> /*
> * The hardware seems to have a race condition when changing modes. The
> @@ -356,6 +360,12 @@ static int __maybe_unused mx51_ecspi_config(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx,
> writel(ctrl, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CTRL);
> writel(cfg, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG);
>
> + if (config->mode & SPI_LOOP)
> + lpb |= MX51_ECSPI_LOOP;
> +
> + if ((readl(spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_TEST) & MX51_ECSPI_LOOP) != lpb)
> + writel(lpb, spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_TEST);
> +
> /*
> * Wait until the changes in the configuration register CONFIGREG
> * propagate into the hardware. It takes exactly one tick of the
> @@ -1128,6 +1138,9 @@ static int spi_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> spi_imx = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> spi_imx->bitbang.master = master;
>
> + spi_imx->devtype_data = of_id ? of_id->data :
> + (struct spi_imx_devtype_data *)pdev->id_entry->driver_data;
> +
> for (i = 0; i < master->num_chipselect; i++) {
> int cs_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "cs-gpios", i);
> if (!gpio_is_valid(cs_gpio) && mxc_platform_info)
> @@ -1154,10 +1167,10 @@ static int spi_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> spi_imx->bitbang.master->unprepare_message = spi_imx_unprepare_message;
> spi_imx->bitbang.master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH;
>
> - init_completion(&spi_imx->xfer_done);
> + if (is_imx51_ecspi(spi_imx))
> + spi_imx->bitbang.master->mode_bits |= SPI_LOOP;
>
> - spi_imx->devtype_data = of_id ? of_id->data :
> - (struct spi_imx_devtype_data *) pdev->id_entry->driver_data;
> + init_completion(&spi_imx->xfer_done);
Some unrelated lines are moved in these two hunks. Is this necessary or
just some leftover from development?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists