[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151207103614.04bafa78@xhacker>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:36:14 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 PART-RESEND 0/2] berlin sdhci clock clean up
Dear Sebastian,
On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 11:07:41 +0100
Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 19.11.2015 21:31, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > On 16.11.2015 11:56, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >> Add or fix the optional clock property, then remove the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED
> >> flag for sdio clk(s).
> >>
> >> This is a partialy resend of
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-October/379457.html
> >>
> >> patch3, patch4 has been merged.
> >
> > Great! Really!
> >
> > As they have been taken without my Acked-by, ignoring my request to
> > _not_ remove the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flags _before_ these two, the
> > remaining patches now become fixes.
> >
> > Please resend the patches with a proper description what and why they
> > are fixes now.
>
> Is this going to be resolved anytime soon?
>
> If not, I am going to send a revert for the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED patch
> and we start this from the beginning.
I will send patches today.
Thanks a lot,
Jisheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists